RESUMO
The purpose of this study was to compare the machining efficiency of a flexible stainless steel K-type hand file recently introduced by Brasseler USA ("F-Style files"), with that of a well-studied Endodontic instrument ("Flex-o-files," Maillefer Dentsply), that has been on the market for more than 20 years. The comparison of machining efficiencies of these two brands of files was conducted on both dentin and plexiglas substrates, using an apparatus that allowed a constant force to be applied from each file being tested. The results indicated that the Brasseler instruments had poorer machining efficiency than those of the Maillefer files.
Assuntos
Ligas Dentárias , Preparo de Canal Radicular/instrumentação , Aço Inoxidável , Ligas Dentárias/química , Materiais Dentários/química , Dentina/ultraestrutura , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Maleabilidade , Polimetil Metacrilato/química , Aço Inoxidável/química , Estresse Mecânico , Propriedades de SuperfícieRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physical properties of a flexible stainless steel K-type hand file recently introduced by Brasseler USA (F-Style files; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA), in comparison to those of a well-studied instrument (Flex-o-files; Maillefer-Dentsply, Ballaigues, Switzerland), that has been on the market for more than 20 yr. The physical properties measured included torque at failure, angular deflection at failure, flexibility, and consistency of diameter at 3 mm from the cutting tip; and the evaluations were carried out on size #10 through #50 files of each of the two brands being tested. The results indicated that the Brasseler instruments were inherently more flexible, but had smaller diameters, lower torque, and angular deflection values at failure, than those of the Maillefer files.
